|   
		Hemp activists try to draw a line between
		their miracle plant and its cannabis cousin
		 
		by Mike Gibson
		 
		In the world of commercial cannabis, it's often difficult to separate sober
		enterprise from its bong-trafficking counterpart. Take, for instance, the
		Hemp Store in Gatlinburg. Announced by nothing more than a storefront logo
		and the wafting, musky-sweet odor of patchouli, the cozy hut off Highway
		321 warehouses reams of literature on hemp, the wonder weed; textile stalwart;
		Herculean cord-maker; New Age salve; enviro-friendly fuel source; fiber
		nonpareil. Its floor is a veritable museum exhibit of hemp products, full
		of unvarnished tree-limb display racks
		 
		laden with hemp T-shirts, hemp blazers, hemp vests, hemp jeans, hemp wallets,
		hemp backpacks, hemp guitar bags, hemp jewelry, hemp lip balm...
		 
		Yet the shop is also strewn with magazines, window decals, bumper stickers,
		and smart-ass T-shirts celebrating hemp's reprobate cousin, marijuana, the
		wacky weed; fog inducer; brain-cell killer; de facto Taco Bell advocate;
		illicit drug of choice for some three generations.
		 
		And hidden behind a bead-crusted bamboo curtain (dubbed the "Smoking Hut")
		in the rear are two glass display cases full of lustrous, exotically contoured
		water pipesthe term "bong" is verboten; due to an absurd legislative
		mandate, even the most convoluted assemblage of glass lobes and plastic cylinders
		must be labeled "For tobacco use only." But the subterfuge is painfully
		transparent, and the assortment of goods is colorfully broadskull pipes,
		space-alien pipes, teddy bear pipes, dolphin pipes, Sesame Street pipes...
		 
		Agriculture and counterculture, it would seem, make for uneasy
		bedfellowsor poor housemates, at any rate. Hemp Store manager Jason
		Owens, a 22-year-old Nashville expatriate, claims he would just as soon eliminate
		the Smoking Hut and its deceptively-labeled wares outright, although he confesses
		that "it would be difficult to stay open," given that pipe sales account
		for roughly half of the store's business.
		 
		"I'd rather the hemp products speak for themselves," says Owens, who, by
		the way, is careful to maintain the "tobacco only" party line when discussing
		his selection of smoking implements. "If you ask me personally, I think it
		all should be legalhemp farming, marijuana for medical or recreational
		purposes, whatever. But the issues should be separated. A lot of people like
		to put them together, and there's no point in it."
		 
		Which nods again at the strange dichotomy that lies at the heart of the cannabis
		question, the tug-of-war between the ostensibly serious business of hemp-related
		commerce and the head-shop aesthetic that often attends it. It's a curious
		cultural overlap, especially given the recent public awakening to the almost
		breathtakingly extensive range of hemp's merits and applications.
		 
		To wit: the fiber from both the hemp stalk and its core is uniquely versatile
		and durable, with almost unrivaled utility in textile, paper (where it reportedly
		has four times the yield-per-acre of wood pulp), rope, and even plastics
		production. The oil from the hemp seed holds further promise as a food source
		rivaling soybeans, as a chemical additive and all-purpose lubricant, and
		as a bio-diesel fuel with sterling ecological credentials. And all of these
		benefits, hemp supporters remind us, are derived from a plant that grows
		seed to stalk in roughly four months, requiring few if any environmentally
		unfriendly chemical facilitants.
		 
		For all intents and purposes, however, hemp farming is illegal in the United
		States, stymied by a 60-year-old federal act purportedly drafted to remedy
		the rampant social ills wrought by the plant's devil-weed kin. That obstacle
		notwithstanding, farmers, academics, and business leaders have recently begun
		to rediscover an entire mislaid industry, a lost mainstay of American
		agriculture, and trumpet its virtues in the pages of staid, respectable
		publications with names like Pulp & Paper, Delta Farm Press, and Agri
		Alternatives..
		 
		At the Missouri-based Hemp Industry Association, one of a growing number
		of national hemp organizations, board member Candi Penn claims membership
		"seems to be doubling every year," with more than $50 million in sales projected
		for its 210 member businesses in 1997. International corporate entities such
		as Adidas (tennis shoes) and Mercedes-Benz (car interiors) are using imported
		hemp in their product lines. And locally, shops like the Hemp Store, Whatever
		(a psychedelic gift shop on Cumberland Avenue), Threds, and Little Sisters
		Gifts vend a sprawling array of hemp wares.
		 
		This nascent hemp renaissance has already birthed laws permitting experimental
		hemp agriculture in three states, with similar legislation under consideration
		in several more, including Tennessee.
		 
		The rub is that the movement boasts a longer-running but perhaps less reputable
		subset of boostersneo-hippies, bohemian college kids, drug legalization
		advocateswho some critics believe undermine the cause with their mixed
		agenda of libertine hedonism and environmental concern. As one local activist
		puts it, skeptics often look at the hemp movement as little more than "a
		bunch of long-hairs trying to justify smoking weed."
		 
		A Hemp Primer
		 
		That perception is in part linked to what may be the biggest lingering
		misconception about cannabisthat hemp and marijuana are one and the
		same; or to quote one scruffy-chinned local advocate, that hemp products
		are, in essence, "made of pot."
		 
		And that's hardly the case, says Dr. Neil Rhodes, professor and extension
		weed control specialist at the University of Tennessee. Rhodes explains that
		hemp and marijuana are actually distinct hybrids of the same species, Cannabis
		sativaas different from one another as any other two distinct crop
		strains or perhaps even breeds of dog.
		 
		"Typically a hemp plant would be a poor source of hallucinogen, while the
		plants bred for their hallucinogenic properties would be a poor source of
		fiber," Rhodes says. He recalls with a chuckle the story of a hemp research
		facility in Stovall, Mississippi, plagued by a rash of break-ins, followed
		in short order by an outbreak of acute lung irritation among incoming patients
		at the emergency room of a local hospital.
		 
		Marijuana, says Rhodes, contains a higher concentration of
		delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the psychoactive ingredient in dope
		that casts brain cells into muddled disarray and stimulates the command centers
		that govern late-night Twinkie binges. While the THC level in marijuana generally
		runs between 2 and 7 percent, and sometimes exceeds 10 percent in especially
		high-grade weed, the THC in hemp measures well below 1 percent.
		 
		The two plants are similar in several respectsthey range between 6
		and 16 feet in height, and the mature bushes share roughly the same leaf
		configuration. But whereas marijuana is cultivated for the fragrant green
		buds that copiously adorn the full-grown plant, hemp farmers seek to nourish
		the stalk at the expense of the foliage.
		 
		"With hemp, you've got a large number of plants in one square foot of soil,"
		says Penn. "That makes for tall, straight stalks, which make for the best
		fiber. With marijuana, the plants are placed farther apart to grow out the
		bush."
		 
		So given these differences, why is hemp farming a federal crime in the United
		States? The short answer is that the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 essentially
		rolled marijuana and hemp into the same fat illicit spliff, eventually placing
		hemp farming under the auspices of the Drug Enforcement Agency (which hasn't
		issued a license in decades). The long answer is more complex and begs some
		knowledge of hemp history.
		 
		Almost every available reference material on the subject of hemp will at
		some point recite the same gee-whiz litany of Ripley-esque historical
		factoidsthat the sails of the Mayflower were woven from hemp fibers;
		that the first two drafts of the Declaration of Independence were scrawled
		on hemp paper; that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson counted hemp among
		their chief crops; that it was once the chief source of paper and cloth
		worldwide...
		 
		"Without question, it was grown substantially and was a very important early
		fiber source," says Rhodes, adding that the fiber was particularly important
		for seafaring endeavors, given its stubborn resistance to rot and salt damage.
		 
		Because of the difficulty involved in harvesting hemp and separating fiber
		from pulp, usage declined somewhat with the rise of other, more readily-harvested
		materials. But with the advent of new technologies for harvesting and stripping
		the plant, the industry was, by several accounts, poised for a resurgence
		at the onset of the 1930s. It was at that point that the fate of hemp was
		suddenly and inextricably intertwined with that of its tokable relative.
		 
		"There are some fairly credible conspiracy theories as to why hemp was targeted
		[by the '37 law]," says David Hollingsworth, proprietor of Industrial Grade
		Hemp Company, a Crossville-based mail order hemp clothing distributor. "There
		were some powerful interests who definitely would have benefited by controlling
		hemp."
		 
		Hemp advocates like Jack Herer, author of The Emperor Wears No Clothes, a
		veritable scripture for disciples of both hemp and marijuana legalization,
		believe the 1937 Marijuana Tax Law was the product of a conspiracy hatched
		by players in the chemical and paper industries, and that the era's "reefer
		madness" anti-marijuana scare tactics were little more than a ploy to stifle
		domestic hemp production.
		 
		Whatever the case, the '37 act placed hemp farming under federal auspices,
		first taxing it prohibitively, then controlling it outright. And save for
		a brief period in the 1940s when production was vigorously encouraged for
		the sake of the war effort (for naval use), hemp farming has since been
		effectively illegal in the United States.
		 
		...And it makes great
		rope!
		 
		But if there's any truth in the notion that the campaign against marijuana
		was a red herring conceived by self-serving industrialists, the colossal
		irony of the hemp renaissance is that many of its earliest and staunchest
		champions have been immersed in the sort of countercultural trappings commonly
		associated with the drug.
		 
		A regular at Cumberland Avenue tie-dye hot-spots, 22-year-old Joy Higdon
		began weaving hemp jewelry three-and-a-half years ago to scrape up extra
		coin for an extended Grateful Dead road-trip. "When you don't have any money,
		you can take jewelry with you and make enough for food and gas," says Higdon,
		a senior in Environmental Studies at UT.
		 
		The excursion proved to be a comic misadventure straight out of Ken Kesey's
		Merry Pranksters-era diary; Higdon and a handful of friends piled into a
		dilapidated old VW bus that they would abandon twice, parting with it temporarily
		in Arkansas before finally leaving it for dead in New York. Fortunately for
		Higdon and her cash-strapped travel companions, her elaborately-beaded
		macramé necklaces and bracelets were hot tickets on the Deadhead circuit.
		 
		"It's almost like wearing jewelry that's made out of marijuana," Higdon says
		with a laugh. "People like to wear it because it makes a statement. Some
		of them are just into the marijuana aspect and aren't as aware of the
		agricultural side of it, so I try to give them some facts. They're really
		surprised when they hear about what hemp can do."
		 
		Higdon's brand of tie-dye activism isn't uncommon; hemp vendors and legalization
		advocates are a staple on the neo-psychedelic jam-band circuit (Phish, Widespread
		Panic, et al), while activists groups like the National Organization to Reform
		Marijuana Laws (NORML) simultaneously champion both the practical and
		recreational uses of cannabis.
		 
		It is, at times, an uneasy juxtaposition, one that doesn't always sit well
		with some of the sober business interests seeking legalized hemp agriculture,
		often in the face of legislators and law enforcement officials skeptical
		of the movement's dope-centric underpinnings.
		 
		Cordova, Tenn.'s Peter Nelson, for one, is almost scornful in assessing some
		of his fellow hemp advocates. Nelson's year-old firm, Galloway Fields Co.,
		is exploring the commercial potential of hemp and a variety of other so-called
		alternative fibers.
		 
		"With hemp, lots of people have mixed agendas, and sometimes they use things
		that aren't necessarily true to push those agendas," says Nelson. "We're
		coming from a farming perspective, a world trade perspective. Our work has
		nothing to do with a drug-related agenda."
		 
		But according to Hollingsworth, who dates his activism back to a day 10 years
		ago when he saw a hemp clothing display in Spencer's in West Town Mall, the
		beads-and-patchouli contingent has played an indispensable role in rescuing
		hemp from history's rag-heap.
		 
		"In a sense, that kind of association hurts because it keeps in people's
		minds that this might be just another way to sneak in marijuana legislation,"
		says Hollingsworth. "It's hard to explain what you're trying to do when you're
		wearing dreadlocks, nose rings, and a Grateful Dead T-shirt. But somewhere
		along the way, industry people have listened to these people. If not for
		those people, the hemp movement might be out of business."
		 
		"When we dealt with European countries, we always heard 'Americans can't
		separate their rope from their dope,'" says John Morris, a 25-year-old
		Knoxvillian who co-founded an urban apparel company in 1994 before leaving
		the business to finish school. "But a lot of hemp entrepreneurs are young
		people with a broad perspective, and a lot of hemp products are sold to young
		people."
		 
		With no domestic hemp sources available, however, enterprises like Morris'
		are forced to rely on pricier imported fiber, purchases that are often subject
		to additional tariffs and taxes; a pair of hemp pants from Morris' former
		company, for instance, sold for nearly $70 retail. And an otherwise
		cost-efficient ream of hemp paper, says Hollingsworth, runs in excess of
		$20, some three to four times a ream of its wood pulp counterpart.
		 
		"That wouldn't be the case if we had any sources here," says Hollingsworth.
		"Right now, a lot of people who buy hemp products do so because they're taking
		a stand, not because it's more economical."
		 
		That may change soon. Penn says Vermont, Hawaii, and North Dakota have passed
		laws permitting experimental crops in 1998, while 12 more states have pending
		legislation.
		 
		There's nothing like
		homegrown
		 
		That the movement is gathering steam was further evidenced by a hemp presentation
		staged at this year's National Conference of State Legislators. The demonstration
		so impressed Tennessee freshman state Representative Kathryn Bowers (D-Memphis)
		that she brought a similar presentation before the state agriculture committee
		during the first half of this year's assembly, and in January will sponsor
		a bill to make hemp farming legal for commercial as well as experimental
		use in Tennessee, albeit with more restrictions than other crops.
		 
		As vice chair of the ag committee, Bowers sees hemp as both a utopian
		alternative, a boon to an economy too heavily dependent on tobacco farming
		(with the livelihoods of more than 25,000 families pinned to the crop, according
		to her statistics), and a beacon for burgeoning new industry as hemp's viability
		(and respectability) quotient continues to rise.
		 
		"That's why we're pushing for commercial farming, not just research crops,"
		says Bowers. "It's to our benefit, economically speaking, to get ahead of
		the curve."
		 
		Bowers anticipates resistance from a few quartersparticularly law
		enforcementalthough she says feedback from fellow legislators thus
		far has been encouraging. "I expect to hear some dissent from police agencies
		and also legislators who are reluctant because of the marijuana association.
		There are some fears that law enforcement wouldn't be able to tell the difference
		between the plants. But from the information I've received, I don't believe
		that telling them apart will be a problem."
		 
		What could be a problem, say some observers, is raising enough awareness
		and arousing enough vocal activism to sway reticent, backside-conscious
		lawmakersbreaking through the wall of apathy that, particularly in
		East Tennessee, seems to hem in the ground swell of public support necessary
		for social and legal change.
		 
		On the surface, the Knoxville area looks like a trough of hemp activism,
		with its vast, fertile farming hinterlands, its large university population,
		and its preoccupation with many of the hippie-retro countercultural phenomena
		that often go hand-in-hand with that certain sector of the movement.
		 
		But in recent years, two would-be hemp festivals have been canceled (in
		Crossville and Gatlinburg), and discounting a handful of entrepreneurs and
		self-styled advocates, the movement has no organized presence hereabouts.
		"A lot of the hemp jewelry and other trappings you see here are more about
		making a fashion statement than a political one," says Owens.
		 
		"What I saw a lot was that people here will talk about it over a beer or
		buy a necklace, and that's their vote," says Morris. "They would 'ooh' and
		'aah' and giggle about wearing an ankle bracelet, but when it came to buying
		a pair of pants that was maybe a little more expensive, it was like, 'Sorry,
		I'm strapped for cash right now.' In places like California or Colorado,
		people are more willing to forego a little beer money or whatever to make
		a statement.
		 
		"Ultimately, it's just a matter of time before enough moneyed interests get
		involved and laws are passed, or someone with a little capital takes it into
		litigation. It's just a shame it won't happen sooner. We have a chance to
		take the lead, and we're not doing it because we can't get our botany straight."
		 |